The charges, copies of which were obtained by Buzz Feed News, specifically make reference to an event on Feb.

10 in which Tesla allegedly intimidated three employees who were “passing out literature regarding their union organizing efforts, working conditions, the confidentiality agreement, and their rights under the NLRA.” On March 23, the charge alleges, Tesla broke the law by “instructing employees they were not allowed to pass out any literature unless it was pre-approved by the employer.”In an emailed statement, Tesla said it is “aware of the filing of unfair labor practice allegations” but “believes the [unfair labor practice] allegations are entirely without merit.” The company said it plans to respond “as part of the NLRB process.” Tesla's confidentiality agreement is embedded below.

is intimidating someone illegal-48is intimidating someone illegal-75

That agreement, according to a copy obtained by the blog Teslarati, bars workers from sharing information about Tesla products, communicating with the media about Tesla, posting photos or videos taken inside Tesla facilities online, and writing “about your work in any social media, blog, or book.”More recently, nearly 60 labor and community groups signed a letter criticizing the confidentiality agreement and taking Musk to task for creating a work environment in which some workers feel their right to discuss union activities has been stifled.“You can’t fix problems if you’re not allowed to talk about them,” said Tesla employee Michael Sanchez in an email forwarded by the communications team representing the union.

“The confidentiality agreement we were required to sign went too far.

She said the same conduct "should be prosecuted under a neutral law that doesn't target specific symbols." The ruling means "the government has the authority to single out particular symbols for criminalization," said Josh Wheeler, an attorney with the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression, affiliated with the University of Virginia. " The ruling returned the justices to the often emotional area of government regulation of conduct that can also be considered symbolic speech.

In 1969, the court upheld a man's conviction for burning his draft card during the Vietnam War.

It can also include other offensive nonverbal actions like creating circumstances that limits your ability to do your job and get your work done on time or at all..

In the last couple of decades, the amount of workers who admit that they have been the victim of a bully at work has been steadily growing more and more.

It’s getting to be very obvious that intimidation in the workplace is a huge problem, and no one certain thing can explain why it’s becoming so much more prevalent recently.

Financial experts claim that the current recession and slow recovery has been extremely stressful on employers and managers.

The 6-3 ruling upheld a Virginia law and similar bans in other states, including California.